Added simple 286 detection code #53
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
Owner
|
Thanks for that! I have actually written the code to do 8086/V30/V40 specific detection, but it's not included due to the code size (>100 bytes IIRC) not able to fit into the main builds. I absolutely will keep this as reference since I do still want to get into a possible 286 version at some point soon. :) |
Contributor
Author
|
@640-KB What do you think? Can it find its way in to mainline? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added simple 286 detection code.
This does not actually do anything except for informing the user that they have (presumable) a 286 acceleration board in there PC/XT machine.
I'm submitting this mainly for reference as I expect you would like to refactor the CPU detection code and generalize the CPU detection. There is a lot of things that seems to assume NOT 8088(6) means V20. So I don't have the guts to rewrite that atm. :)