Skip to content

Feedback needed: Which syntaxes to add, which to get or keep their own buttons? #42

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
3 tasks
AndydeCleyre opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Open
3 tasks

Feedback needed: Which syntaxes to add, which to get or keep their own buttons? #42

AndydeCleyre opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@AndydeCleyre
Copy link
Owner

AndydeCleyre commented Nov 10, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Please provide input to fill these categories!

Syntaxes to add:

  • roc?

Syntaxes to get their own buttons:

  • zig?

Syntaxes to lose their own buttons:

  • restructuredtext?
@AndydeCleyre AndydeCleyre changed the title Add syntaxes: elm, roc Add syntaxes: elm? roc, factor Aug 16, 2023
@AndydeCleyre AndydeCleyre changed the title Add syntaxes: elm? roc, factor Add syntaxes Sep 10, 2024
@AndydeCleyre
Copy link
Owner Author

Now a boatload of new syntaxes are supported by putting the language at the starting code fence (or using the Telegram UI to specify the language).

I will repurpose this issue as a place for feedback on new syntaxes still to add, and which syntaxes should get their own buttons.

@AndydeCleyre AndydeCleyre changed the title Add syntaxes Feedback needed: Which syntaxes to add, which to get or keep their own buttons? Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@AndydeCleyre