Skip to content

feat: TypeBuilder needs stronger semantics #849

@sxlijin

Description

@sxlijin

There are a lot of things that users can't do with TypeBuilder that they should be able to do, e.g. delete fields.

#2483 does a lot of work to implement TypeRegistry, which should address these issues.

I'm going to dupe all other TypeBuilder improvement issues against this one, so we can make sure that we address all of them before shipping #2483.

See also:

Sub-issues

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions