Skip to content

Conversation

@daphnehanse11
Copy link

No description provided.

daphnehanse11 and others added 27 commits May 27, 2025 10:23
…ts for FPL decile analysis and dataset comparison
Analysis showing impact of repealing OBBBA reform on NJ households by congressional district.

Impact of OBBBA repeal (reverting to pre-OBBBA law):
- 82,002 households (2.1%) would benefit from repeal (avg $6,895 gain)
- 3,376,522 households (85.3%) would be hurt by repeal (avg $3,007 loss)
- 501,514 households (12.7%) see no change
- Overall average: -$2,421 per household

OBBBA benefits most NJ households, so repealing it would hurt 85% of them.
The SALT cap removal in OBBBA likely drives these benefits.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Renamed files to use clearer, simpler names
- Moved results CSV to data/NJ directory
- Updated script to output to renamed file

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
MaxGhenis and others added 2 commits September 24, 2025 18:14
- Removed nj_salt copy.ipynb (duplicate of nj_salt.ipynb)
- Removed hack copy.ipynb (duplicate of hack.ipynb)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
MaxGhenis and others added 6 commits September 24, 2025 18:20
OBBBA folder (full reform with rate changes + SALT removal):
- obbba_results.csv: Shows 85% would lose from OBBBA repeal
- Supporting scripts and notebooks

SALT folder (SALT cap removal only):
- Shows 98% see no change (only affects high-income itemizers)
- Supporting analysis files

This separation clarifies the different reforms being analyzed.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants