[Feature]: Build cTAKES using GitHub action?

[Johnsd11]

What problem does this solve?

Faster cTAKES build

Describe the solution you'd like

How about setting up a GitHub action for building cTAKES?

Alternative solutions you've considered

No response

Priority

None

Contact Details

No response

[Johnsd11]

It also seems like quite the beast to romp around in a GH action. I suppose that we could have build profiles that only compile the basic modules that are in the default clinical pipeline and things like that. Even without that, I don't think that we'd have problems with the infra rules https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-policy.html

I don't place that as a high priority, but if anybody else does then I say "go for it". https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-secrets.html

[Johnsd11]

Right, I honestly forgot that there's Jenkins.

I guess that's because I didn't see Jenkins badges on the PRs:

• Issue #20 - Crossgrade to SLF4J #21

Cf.

• Issue #369: Move isTypeName and isFeatureName to public API uima-uimaj#370

I can see you're still using "traditional" UI-configured Jenkins jobs instead of Jenkins pipelines
that are managed in the version control.

Would you mind if I set up a pipeline build that can handle PRs for cTAKES by copying the approach
I have taken in UIMA?