TypeScript support. Doc comment.

[infacto]

Don't scare ... just consider to define types. There are multiple ways.
Doc comments are useful with or without TypeScript. Definition files (*.d.ts) can be generated from this comments and the current source code. Or we could move to TypeScript. Ideas are welcome.

Current Alternative
DefinitelyTyped
Types from @types are mostly a gambling game. Because in most cases they are not synchronized and hand crafted. And you have one more dependency. I would prefer a build-in solution. Many libraries already have this. It's optional and separated. It will not blow up the build size.

[kn0wn]

It was inevitable this was going to come up. I do support our TypeScript overlords, however due to the current engine architecture, it would need a complete re-write to get it working properly. I'll tag it for now for consideration when the next major release is in the works.

[Ridvanovskyy]

It was inevitable this was going to come up. I do support our TypeScript overlords, however due to the current engine architecture, it would need a complete re-write to get it working properly. I'll tag it for now for consideration when the next major release is in the works.

Is it possible to participate in this?