Skip to content

Multi tenanting #290

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Angrigo opened this issue Apr 10, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Multi tenanting #290

Angrigo opened this issue Apr 10, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@Angrigo
Copy link

Angrigo commented Apr 10, 2025

Will sonic evolve into a multi-tenant approach?

@lane711
Copy link
Owner

lane711 commented Apr 10, 2025

Good question. Do you mean multi tenant where each tenant has the same schema?

@Angrigo
Copy link
Author

Angrigo commented Apr 10, 2025

No, each tenant would have a custom schema and/or separate bindings to custom R2/D1

I see a platform where I can manage my different businesses, each business has a custom schema.

Image

@lane711
Copy link
Owner

lane711 commented Apr 10, 2025

That is not in our roadmap. It would technically be possible for sure but there would be a very small subset of the community that would need this kind of setup.

Another option might be keep each schema as a separate instance and sync the user related tables across instances.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants