Improve parentheses matchers

[nicolas-graves]

TY for this wonderful package.

I use it along with embark, and can't avoid to notice that embark matchers for parentheses often get better results at identifing the right parenthesis, in particular when there's a string with an open parenthesis in-between.

See the following example, with a voluntarily added extra parenthesis :

              (substitute* "test"
                (("\\(.*")
                 "")))

In this case embark matches the right parenthesis, but meow's select round does not.

[DogLooksGood]

Need a little bit more context about what the syntax is using here?

[nicolas-graves]

It's scheme syntax.
I can even reduce the example to ("(")), that might help.

[DogLooksGood]

In my case, it matches _("(")_) correctly.

btw, the parenthesis are not balanced in both examples.

[nicolas-graves]

Precisely, they were not balanced to show that on my side, meow matches the last one, where it should instead match the one before.
Why the _ ? Do you mean we don't have the same experience both using scheme mode with such a simple example?

[nicolas-graves]

I'm using version 1.5.0 (the one in Guix). Should I try with master instead?
(When I mean meow select-round, what I type is .-r).

[DogLooksGood]

I see, I was using meow-block. The thing command is defined based on regexp, those might not be very accurate. And meow-block works with depth of the parenthesis.