You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There has been discussions in the past on leveraging github matrix instead of providing our explicit own. Benefit of this would be less and smaller workflow files.
I sketched how a first step in that direct may look in the snippet below (on top of a rendered test workflow for core); the benefit of this would be around 10 lines of llines removed from workflows files for each tox target.
Since these workflows are generated from tox targets the missing step in our workflow generation scripts would be to group them by tested library.
We also need to benchmark if any change there would affect CI run timings.
There has been discussions in the past on leveraging github matrix instead of providing our explicit own. Benefit of this would be less and smaller workflow files.
I sketched how a first step in that direct may look in the snippet below (on top of a rendered test workflow for core); the benefit of this would be around 10 lines of llines removed from workflows files for each tox target.
Since these workflows are generated from tox targets the missing step in our workflow generation scripts would be to group them by tested library.
We also need to benchmark if any change there would affect CI run timings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: