-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
fix(rivetkit): remove incorrect getEndpoint call in metadata handler #3433
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
3 Skipped Deployments
|
PR ReviewSummaryThis PR fixes an incorrect usage of Code Quality ✅Positive aspects:
Code style: Follows TypeScript conventions and is consistent with the surrounding code. Correctness Analysis ✅Before this PR:
After this PR:
Potential Issues
|
More templates
@rivetkit/actor
@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers
@rivetkit/core
@rivetkit/db
@rivetkit/framework-base
@rivetkit/next-js
@rivetkit/react
rivetkit
@rivetkit/sql-loader
@rivetkit/engine-runner
@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol
commit: |
Code Review - PR #3433SummaryThis PR makes two key improvements to error handling and metadata endpoint logic in RivetKit:
✅ Positive Findings1. Correct semantic fix for metadata handling
This is better because:
The implementation correctly handles both serialization formats:
2. Correct fix for clientEndpoint logic
3. Consistent changes across all affected files
🔍 Observations1. Type safety consideration type ErrorValueJson = {
group: string;
code: string;
message: string;
actionId: number | null;
metadata?: unknown;
};
const val: ErrorValueJson = {
group: value.group,
code: value.code,
message: value.message,
actionId: value.actionId !== undefined ? value.actionId : null,
};2. Conditional field addition pattern if (value.metadata !== undefined) {
val.metadata = value.metadata;
}This ensures the field is completely omitted from JSON when not present, rather than being ✅ Security, Performance, and Quality
📝 Suggestions
Overall AssessmentLGTM ✅ This is a well-executed bug fix that:
The changes are low-risk and improve code correctness. |
ec03062 to
f766dfd
Compare
5f6c780 to
c713cc8
Compare
PR Review: Remove incorrect getEndpoint call in metadata handlerSummaryThis PR removes the Code Quality ✅Positive aspects:
Correctness ✅The change is correct based on the codebase patterns:
Potential Concerns1. Behavior change for However, after reviewing the code, this appears to be correct because:
2. Missing test coverage
Performance Considerations ✅No performance impact - the change removes a function call and simplifies logic. Security Considerations ✅No security concerns. The metadata endpoint is already public and this change doesn't expose any new information. Recommendations
VerdictLGTM ✅ - This is a good fix that corrects a type mismatch and simplifies the logic. The behavior change appears intentional and correct based on the documented interface and usage patterns in the codebase. |
c713cc8 to
412f83b
Compare
f766dfd to
0bc4b29
Compare
|
Deployment failed with the following error: Learn More: https://vercel.com/docs/limits#rate-limits |
PR Review: fix(rivetkit): remove incorrect getEndpoint call in metadata handlerSummaryThis PR removes the Code Quality & Best Practices ✅Positive aspects:
Observations:
Logic Analysis ✅Before: clientEndpoint: runConfig.overrideServerAddress ??
(runConfig.disableDefaultServer ? undefined : getEndpoint(runConfig))After: clientEndpoint: runConfig.overrideServerAddressWhy this is correct:
Security Considerations ✅No security concerns. The change reduces complexity and potential for confusion about endpoint configuration. Performance Considerations ✅Minor improvement: removes an unnecessary function call on every metadata request. Test Coverage
|
Code ReviewSummaryThis PR correctly fixes a type mismatch bug in the metadata handler. The previous code was incorrectly calling What ChangedBefore: clientEndpoint:
runConfig.overrideServerAddress ??
(runConfig.disableDefaultServer
? undefined
: getEndpoint(runConfig)), // ❌ Type error: RunnerConfig passed to function expecting ClientConfigAfter: clientEndpoint: runConfig.overrideServerAddress, // ✅ Correctly uses RunnerConfig propertyAnalysis✅ CorrectnessThe fix is correct for the following reasons:
✅ Code Quality
✅ Behavior PreservationThe behavior is preserved for the intended use case:
The removal of the Potential ConcernsNone identified. The change is straightforward and correct. Recommendations✅ Approve and merge - This is a clean bug fix that:
Testing ConsiderationsConsider verifying:
Great catch on this type mismatch! 🎯 |
Merge activity
|

No description provided.