Skip to content

Conversation

@JeanChristopheMorinPerso
Copy link
Member

Add equality operators to AnyVector in Python. This is mostly useful for OTIO development, but it might also be useful to anyone using OTIO.

Extracted from #1490.

Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe Morin <jean_christophe_morin@hotmail.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 7, 2023

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 58.13953% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 80.00%. Comparing base (6f4ed5e) to head (7499c89).
⚠️ Report is 112 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...-opentimelineio/opentimelineio/core/_core_utils.py 48.57% 16 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1575      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.04%   80.00%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         197      197              
  Lines       21720    21755      +35     
  Branches     4309     4316       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits        17386    17406      +20     
- Misses       2182     2197      +15     
  Partials     2152     2152              
Flag Coverage Δ
py-unittests 80.00% <58.13%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
tests/test_core_utils.py 98.75% <100.00%> (ø)
...-opentimelineio/opentimelineio/core/_core_utils.py 79.69% <48.57%> (-4.82%) ⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6f4ed5e...7499c89. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@JeanChristopheMorinPerso
Copy link
Member Author

The implementation is working, but only for ==. I'll close and re-open when I have a better implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants