Skarakra/msi auth feature

[samikay101]

Commit Type

• feature - New functionality
• fix - Bug fix
• refactor - Code restructuring without behavior change
• perf - Performance improvement
• docs - Documentation update
• test - Test-related changes
• chore - Maintenance/tooling

Risk Level

• Low - Minor changes, limited scope
• Medium - Moderate changes, some user impact
• High - Major changes, significant user/system impact

What & Why

Impact of Change

• Users:
• Developers:
• System:

Test Plan

• Unit tests added/updated
• E2E tests added/updated
• Manual testing completed
• Tested in:

Contributors

Screenshots/Videos

[github-actions]

🤖 AI PR Validation Report

PR Review Results

Thank you for your submission! Here's detailed feedback on your PR title and body compliance:

❌ PR Title

• Current: Skarakra/msi auth feature
• Issue: Title is too generic, missing clear and concise context. PR titles must be descriptive and summarize the actual change, e.g., the feature being added, scope, or affected module.
• Recommendation: Change to something like Add managed identity (MSI) authentication to Skarakra connector or Implement MSI-based authentication flow for Skarakra. Be explicit!

---

❌ Commit Type

• No commit type selected.
• Only one commit type must be checked. None are marked.
• Note: Mark the main purpose, e.g., [x] feature - New functionality. DO NOT leave all unchecked.

---

❌ Risk Level

• No risk level selected; no label set (should be like risk:low, risk:medium, risk:high).
• Risk level must be selected in the PR body and a matching label must be added.
• Assessment: Based on the scale and scope (97 files, 5455 additions, 1616 deletions; potentially authentication logic), this is likely a HIGH risk change. If you assess it as lower, justify in the PR body & label accordingly.

---

❌ What & Why

• Current: (Missing)
• Issue: This section is blank. You must give brief context: What is changed and why is it needed? E.g., Enables use of MSI for secure authentication...
• Recommendation: Fill this out, e.g., Add support for MSI authentication to eliminate plain text secrets, improve security for Skarakra workflows.

---

❌ Impact of Change

• No real details provided—section only contains hints.
• Recommendation: Fill for each:
  • Users: e.g., Users can now authenticate with MSI. Existing connections will continue to work.
  • Developers: e.g., New API pattern required, code examples updated.
  • System: e.g., Dependency on Azure Identity library added.

---

❌ Test Plan

• No testing selected, section only presents the template.
• Assessment: Given this is a major feature (auth flow), unit tests and manual/E2E testing must be marked and described. Select at least one!

---

⚠️ Contributors

• No contributors listed. Not required, but please credit anyone who contributed (PM, design, etc.), if applicable.

---

⚠️ Screenshots/Videos

• Section blank. Not required unless visual change. If visual change included, add screenshots/video.

---

Summary Table

Section	Status	Recommendation
Title	❌	Use clear, descriptive context
Commit Type	❌	Select one commit type
Risk Level	❌	Select one risk level & label it
What & Why	❌	Fill in brief change context
Impact of Change	❌	Indicate impact for Users, Devs, System
Test Plan	❌	Select at least one applicable test plan
Contributors	⚠️	Optionally list contributors
Screenshots/Videos	⚠️	Add if visual change, else leave blank

---

Please update the PR title and body to fully comply with the template above—including commit type, risk level, What & Why, Impact, Test Plan, and PR label! This is a large, high-risk feature—make the rationale VERY explicit for reviewers. Thank you for helping maintain high-quality PR documentation for your team!

---

Last updated: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 02:34:24 GMT