Skip to content

Conversation

gladjohn
Copy link
Contributor

@gladjohn gladjohn commented Aug 18, 2025

Fixes - Moves away from Lab API to KV based solution

Changes proposed in this request

  • Adds a lab project to access lab vault
  • Adds unit tests

Next steps :-

  • Add new vault
  • Add integration tests
  • Convert tests to use the new solution

Testing
unit tests

Performance impact
none

Documentation

  • All relevant documentation is updated.

@gladjohn gladjohn requested a review from a team as a code owner August 18, 2025 00:00
@gladjohn gladjohn marked this pull request as draft August 18, 2025 00:00
@gladjohn gladjohn changed the title [DRAFT] Lab Access with Lay Vault [DRAFT] Lab Access with KeyVault Aug 18, 2025
/// <summary>
/// Represents the authentication style used by a test user.
/// </summary>
public enum AuthType
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should treat the lab API as a public API, since this is how other SDKs consume it. Do we really need to increase the public surface ?

Microsoft.Identity.Client.Labs.CloudType
Microsoft.Identity.Client.Labs.CloudType.Canary = 5 -> Microsoft.Identity.Client.Labs.CloudType
Microsoft.Identity.Client.Labs.CloudType.China = 3 -> Microsoft.Identity.Client.Labs.CloudType
Microsoft.Identity.Client.Labs.CloudType.Dod = 2 -> Microsoft.Identity.Client.Labs.CloudType
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

???

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants