Skip to content

Conversation

kyule
Copy link
Member

@kyule kyule commented Jun 27, 2025

for consideration on how it could look if we switch to a resolvable occurrenceID and add "IGSN:" to the list display (it doesn't work until the occurrenceIDs are actually replaced locally though of course)

Note: this no longer names "SESAR" on the full record details, and it doesn't update the table display.

kyule added 2 commits June 27, 2025 15:30
for consideration on how it could look if we switch to a resolvable occurrenceID and add "IGSN:" to the list display  (it doesn't work until the occurrenceIDs are actually replaced)

Note: this no longer names "SESAR" on the full record details and it doesn't update the table display.
@kyule kyule requested review from egbot and sunray1 June 27, 2025 22:47
-remove the "IGSN:" of the list search results to avoid confusion
- add "uuid:" when recordIDs are set, not I also updated the nightly maintenance stored procedure to copy recordID into the occurrenceID field
-set occurrenceID to the igsn uri
-attempt to update code for all necessary instances of occurrenceID  in OccurrenceSesar and IgsnManager
@kyule
Copy link
Member Author

kyule commented Jul 9, 2025

@egbot @sunray1 I've made the changes that I think are necessary for updating the occurrenceIDs and recordIDs. However, I'm not that familiar with the IGSN/SESAR-related code (and it's not necessarily easy to test), so I definitely want both of you to review it when you can

@sunray1
Copy link
Collaborator

sunray1 commented Jul 11, 2025

On reviewing this, I learned that SESAR added url verification to their sample registration - so you'll notice I just removed that field when in development mode

kyule added 2 commits July 11, 2025 13:23
Addresses Chandra's comments by making igsn id itself the link and listing catalog number first on the full record details pages.
Was previously missing the rest of the function needed to extract the igsn
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants