-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 278
Autocheck for new DOMjudge releases #3055
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Discussed during the hackathon in 2023. We allow admins to toggle an autoquery to domjudge.org for 2 reasons: - Alerting users that a new version might exist, helping us in case of security releases. - Giving a gentle nudge for people to upgrade making support easier. - Getting some information on what installations are out there.
return false; | ||
} | ||
$versionLocalString = explode("/", str_replace("DEV", "-prerelease", $this->domjudgeVersion))[0]; | ||
$versionLocal = Version::parse($versionLocalString, false); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why tarball in the user agent and not DOMjudge like we do when shadowing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We also wanted to know which installmethods are out there, so next step is a config variable but I had no idea on how to set that (yet) I suspect a make option..
* the user can see on the website if there is a new Major/minor themselves | ||
* otherwise the latest minor, or Major release. So the user might make the upgrade path: | ||
* DJ6.0.0 -> DJ6.0.6 -> DJ6.6.0 -> DJ9.0.0 instead of | ||
* -> DJ6.0.[1..6] -> DJ6.[1..6] -> DJ[7..9].0.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This whole loop could also be done by sorting the versions lexicographically and taking the next one higher than the local version. This could replace all three checks?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't that give the path over all patches, minor plus patches in that minor etc?
Basically the 2nd path I mentioned.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yeah you might be right but we could solve that by only exposing specific versions on the versions site?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even if the array would only the latest patch release per M.m
release we would still need to filter somewhere.
But I get the point that we should do something smarter so the code is less duplicated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We still need the loop as at best we can only clean the list to always have the highest patch version in the list,
We could ofcourse do this math on the version site and basically only let the server do a lookup there so:
{'1.1.5': '1.5.5',
'1.2.3': '1.2.5',
'1.5.5': '5.5.5'}
where 5 is always the highest version in that release.
But that also feels expensive, it just removes the calculation to another server.
I did some cleanup though and I think this is already more what you want. Although I'm not 100% if it will now not also alert for the current version.
Discussed during the NWERC hackathon in 2023.
We allow admins to toggle an autoquery to domjudge.org for 2 reasons:
Default this doesn't happen, so the admin chooses to enable this themselves so this is different from normal telemetry.