Skip to content

Conversation

dd-octo-sts[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot commented Sep 22, 2025

This PR updates the tested versions list automatically.

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot requested a review from a team as a code owner September 22, 2025 13:39
@github-actions github-actions bot added profiling Relates to the Continuous Profiler tracing area:asm labels Sep 22, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.74%. Comparing base (0bde800) to head (2cf105e).
⚠️ Report is 13 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3427      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.87%   61.74%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         141      141              
  Lines       12481    12481              
  Branches     1630     1630              
==========================================
- Hits         7722     7706      -16     
- Misses       4038     4054      +16     
  Partials      721      721              

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0bde800...2cf105e. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Benchmarks [ tracer ]

Benchmark execution time: 2025-09-30 14:35:14

Comparing candidate commit 53b33a7 in PR branch update-supported-versions with baseline commit 0bde800 in branch master.

Found 4 performance improvements and 3 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 187 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

scenario:BM_TeaSapiSpinup

  • 🟩 execution_time [-149.388µs; -75.412µs] or [-9.501%; -4.796%]

scenario:MessagePackSerializationBench/benchMessagePackSerialization

  • 🟩 execution_time [-7.065µs; -5.835µs] or [-6.430%; -5.311%]

scenario:MessagePackSerializationBench/benchMessagePackSerialization-opcache

  • 🟩 execution_time [-10.938µs; -9.562µs] or [-9.576%; -8.371%]

scenario:PDOBench/benchPDOOverhead

  • 🟥 execution_time [+7.530µs; +11.247µs] or [+2.825%; +4.219%]

scenario:PDOBench/benchPDOOverheadWithDBM

  • 🟥 execution_time [+8.766µs; +12.481µs] or [+3.291%; +4.686%]

scenario:PHPRedisBench/benchRedisOverhead

  • 🟥 execution_time [+24.961µs; +53.092µs] or [+2.330%; +4.956%]

scenario:TraceSerializationBench/benchSerializeTrace

  • 🟩 execution_time [-40.558µs; -31.142µs] or [-9.061%; -6.958%]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:asm profiling Relates to the Continuous Profiler tracing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant