Skip to content

[Explorer] Only files and only folders search #571

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pc223
Copy link
Contributor

@pc223 pc223 commented Jul 18, 2021

Should we have options for only files and only folders search? Seems much better UX, more precise 👌 😄

This PR serve as demo and starting point, not intended to be merge yet, use f <file_name> or d <folder_name> to search.

@taooceros
Copy link
Member

What about make d or f as secondary action keyword?

@pc223
Copy link
Contributor Author

pc223 commented Jul 18, 2021

What about make d or f as secondary action keyword?

What secondary action keyword looks like? Like doc, pa, id? I'm thinking of something like that 😄

@taooceros
Copy link
Member

I am thinking like e d/f {search} or d/f {search} when actionkeyword is *.

@taooceros taooceros added this to the Future milestone Jul 18, 2021
@pc223
Copy link
Contributor Author

pc223 commented Jul 18, 2021

I am thinking like e d/f {search} or d/f {search} when actionkeyword is *.

Personally I prefer f <file_name> or d <folder_name> as main way to use Explorer, seems simpler, less syntax users have to learn.

I use it this way for awhile, seems pretty good, never needed to use e <...> anymore, always d/f <...>.

@jjw24
Copy link
Member

jjw24 commented Jul 18, 2021

Agree with @pc223 , more natural to use as action keywords like the folder path and index search action keywords

What about make d or f as secondary action keyword?

Assuming @taooceros you mean secondary actionkeyword like how it's implemented in pluginsmanager?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants