-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
JSO Compliance : LM #200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
JSO Compliance : LM #200
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #200 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 61.53% 86.05% +24.51%
===========================================
Files 11 13 +2
Lines 1292 1563 +271
===========================================
+ Hits 795 1345 +550
+ Misses 497 218 -279 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
σ::T | ||
meta::NLPModelMeta{T, V} | ||
counters::Counters | ||
end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here too, would it be possible to reuse LLSModels?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure how, LLSModels
does
sure we could write
but this will be impractical in my opinion.
LM TestWithout boundssubsolver : R2On my branch,
On master,
subsolver : R2DHOn my branch,
On master,
With boundssubsolver : R2On my branch,
On master,
subsolver : R2DHOn my branch,
On master,
|
I think we are ready for this one @dpo |
@dpo @MohamedLaghdafHABIBOULLAH
We should merge after #199.