Fix method ambiguity for adjoint multiplication with Symbolics.Arr #1596
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adjoint{T, <:AbstractVector}
withSymbolics.Arr{<:Any, 2}
(issue Ambiguous method on array adjoint of Num #575)Details
The issue occurred when trying to compute expressions like
d' * E
whered
is a symbolic vector andE
is a symbolic matrix. This caused a method ambiguity between:Base.*(x::Adjoint{T, <:AbstractVector} where T, A::AbstractMatrix)
Symbolics.*(A::AbstractMatrix, B::Symbolics.Arr{<:Any, 2})
The fix adds a specific method
@wrapped (*)(x::Adjoint{T, <:AbstractVector} where {T}, A::Symbolics.Arr{<:Any, 2}) = _matmul(x, A) false
that takes precedence and resolves the ambiguity.Test plan
Symbolics.Arr
)Closes #575
🤖 Generated with Claude Code