Improved consistency of rate_function implementations #4144
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JasonGrace2282
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2025
JasonGrace2282
added
the
maintenance
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview: What does this pull request change?
The following rate function now make use of the
unit_intervaldecorator to handlet < 0andt > 1:smoothstepsmootherstepsmoothererstepMotivation and Explanation: Why and how do your changes improve the library?
This change makes the implementations of all rate functions consistent.
Links to added or changed documentation pages
Further Information and Comments
Reviewer Checklist