-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
The prediction accuracy of the pcpvt_base model after mkldnn is turned on is different from that of pure CPU, and the difference is greater than 0.01. #35574
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@lidanqing-intel @jczaja
|
@jczaja This is not urgent for 2.2RC |
@jakpiase Hi, I can not revert for you, because there are too many file conflicts and I m not sure if I could remove or not. Please revert it or fix it before 17th September (which is like night 16th September Poland). Keep updating under this issue. Thanks. |
First step: Second step:
Problem 4:
|
#35794 |
@baoachun I couldn't find a way how to download "..inference/ShuffleNetV2" model, but I have found And I have ran this model. It gives same result with and without oneDNN enabled. If I have tested wrong model could you please tell me how to download the correct one? |
@jakpiase |
Commit id:0be7157185138a5e92732225f56737d34fc532f8
PR: #34192
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: