Skip to content

Conversation

sunyuhan1998
Copy link
Contributor

@sunyuhan1998 sunyuhan1998 commented Jun 30, 2025

We need to add a code style checking and automatic formatting plugin to unify the code style and automatically handle common formatting issues.

In this PR, the Checkstyle and Spotless plugins have been introduced. For Checkstyle, only some of the previously discussed rules have been included in the rule file src/checkstyle/checkstyle.xml, such as disallowing importing unused classes and disallowing wildcard imports. More rules can be added in the future if needed.

As for Spotless, it is currently using the default rules. Both plugins run during the Maven validate phase.

You can directly run mvn clean validate to trigger the checks from both plugins, and run mvn spotless:apply to trigger Spotless to automatically format the code.

@kabir Do you think this direction aligns with what we're hoping for?

…matting.

Signed-off-by: Sun Yuhan <sunyuhan1998@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @sunyuhan1998, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request is a discussion-only proposal to integrate code style checking and automatic formatting tools into the project. My goal is to establish a consistent code style across the repository and provide mechanisms for developers to easily adhere to it, improving readability and maintainability. It introduces Checkstyle for static analysis and Spotless for formatting, both integrated into the Maven build process.

Highlights

  • Introduction of Code Quality Tools: I've introduced both Checkstyle and Spotless Maven plugins to enforce code style and enable automatic formatting. This aims to unify the codebase's appearance and reduce common formatting issues.
  • Maven Integration: Both Checkstyle and Spotless are configured to run during the Maven validate phase. This ensures that style checks and formatting validations are performed early in the build lifecycle.
  • Checkstyle Configuration: Checkstyle is configured with a custom rule set (src/checkstyle/checkstyle.xml) focusing initially on import-related rules, specifically disallowing wildcard imports, redundant imports, illegal imports, and unused imports. More rules can be added later as needed.
  • Spotless Configuration: Spotless is set up to use Google Java Format with the AOSP style. It also includes a rule to automatically remove unused imports, providing basic code cleanup capabilities.
  • Usage Instructions: To trigger the checks, mvn clean validate can be run. For automatic formatting via Spotless, mvn spotless:apply is available.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces Checkstyle and Spotless to enforce code style and formatting, which is a great step for the project's maintainability. My review focuses on the Maven configuration for these new plugins. I've identified a few critical issues, such as incorrect plugin and dependency versions and a misconfigured path for the Checkstyle rules, which would cause build failures. I've also included suggestions to update to the latest tool versions and to simplify the Spotless configuration for better clarity. Addressing these points will ensure the new tools are set up correctly and effectively.

@kabir
Copy link
Collaborator

kabir commented Jun 30, 2025

@sunyuhan1998 Just about to get on a plane, but will look later/tomorrow.

In the meantime, it could be good to see what kind of stuff it reports against the existing codebase. Maybe as a link to a gist, if it is very long :-)

@kabir kabir marked this pull request as draft June 30, 2025 10:44
@kabir
Copy link
Collaborator

kabir commented Jun 30, 2025

BTW I converted the PR to a draft, so that it cannot be merged

@sunyuhan1998
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sunyuhan1998 Just about to get on a plane, but will look later/tomorrow.

In the meantime, it could be good to see what kind of stuff it reports against the existing codebase. Maybe as a link to a gist, if it is very long :-)

Sure, no problem. This is just a rough experimental attempt. I think it will still take some time before we actually integrate it, and during that period we can further discuss and refine the plan in detail.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants