Skip to content

Conversation

@aaronkaplan
Copy link
Contributor

Be aware that the lat/long values are very approximate for now

@Terrtia
Copy link
Member

Terrtia commented Apr 9, 2025

Thank you !

@SteveClement
Copy link
Member

@aaronkaplan can we still merge this? As it is from April (approx. 8 months ago) perhaps you have some stashed changes somewhere.

@Terrtia once Aaron confirms I shall just merge. It looks like an good addition and does not seem to conflict.

@adulau
Copy link
Member

adulau commented Nov 13, 2025

@SteveClement It's a parallel work where we will add new object for geolocation. So we keep this one open until we have the geolocation object in AIL.

@adulau adulau added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 13, 2025
@aaronkaplan
Copy link
Contributor Author

aaronkaplan commented Nov 13, 2025

@aaronkaplan can we still merge this? As it is from April (approx. 8 months ago) perhaps you have some stashed changes somewhere.

@Terrtia once Aaron confirms I shall just merge. It looks like an good addition and does not seem to conflict.

@SteveClement from my side this is an output of the hackathon we had in April, all ready to go , adapt, tune and modify from your side to your liking.
Go for it from my side. If you want to output a geoloc object, that should also be rather easy - based on the code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants