UI: Move Backup Repository to Infrastructure (from Configuration)

[sureshanaparti]

Description

This PR moves the Backup Repository to Infrastructure section (from Configuration). Also, updated listInfrastructure API to return backuprepositories in response.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

• Check the Infrastructure section in the UI. listInfrastructure API returns backuprepositories in response.

BEFORE Changes =>

AFTER Changes =>

(cmk) 🐱 > list infrastructure 
{
  "infrastructure": {
    "alerts": 12,
    "backuprepositories": 2,
    "clusters": 1,
    "cpusockets": 3,
    "hosts": 1,
    "ilbvms": 0,
    "imagestores": 1,
    "managementservers": 1,
    "objectstores": 0,
    "pods": 1,
    "routers": 1,
    "storagepools": 2,
    "systemvms": 3,
    "zones": 1
  }
}
(cmk) 🐱 > 

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 17.42%. Comparing base (ec533cd) to head (f93cb1e).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...he/cloudstack/response/InfrastructureResponse.java	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
.../apache/cloudstack/metrics/MetricsServiceImpl.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main   #11738   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     17.42%   17.42%           
- Complexity    15336    15338    +2     
=========================================
  Files          5892     5893    +1     
  Lines        526521   526526    +5     
  Branches      64293    64294    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits          91767    91769    +2     
- Misses       424401   424404    +3     
  Partials      10353    10353           

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.61% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	18.48% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✔️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 15186

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15189

[sureshanaparti]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14457)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 54978 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr11738-t14457-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 146 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_02_L2_persistent_network	Failure	102.23	test_persistent_network.py
test_03_deploy_and_destroy_VM_and_verify_network_resources_persist	Failure	126.11	test_persistent_network.py

[rajujith]

Tested
LGTM