-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Support iprange while creating remote access vpn #12063
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #12063 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 17.56% 17.56%
Complexity 15538 15538
=========================================
Files 5910 5911 +1
Lines 529351 529363 +12
Branches 64655 64656 +1
=========================================
+ Hits 92976 92982 +6
- Misses 425918 425923 +5
- Partials 10457 10458 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@sudo87 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 15749 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@sudo87 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 15756 |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15765 |
weizhouapache
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
code lgtm
Description
This PR fixes #9707
There is support to provide ip range while creating remote access vpn.
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
Created VPN with different iprange and verified it with listRemoteAccessVpns API
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?