chore: release version v2.5.22 #2589
Annotations
12 errors and 3 warnings
ash-ci (15) / mix test
Process completed with exit code 2.
|
ash-ci (15) / mix test:
test/rel_with_parent_filter_test.exs#L103
test can filter with stack parents (AshPostgres.RelWithParentFilterTest)
|
ash-ci (15) / mix test:
test/aggregate_test.exs#L932
test sum aggregates show the same value with filters on the sum vs filters on relationships (AshSql.AggregateTest)
|
ash-ci (15) / mix test:
test/tuple_test.exs#L21
test tuple type with force_attribute_change can be updated (AshPostgres.Test.TupleTest)
|
ash-ci (16) / mix test
Process completed with exit code 2.
|
ash-ci (16) / mix test:
test/tuple_test.exs#L21
test tuple type with force_attribute_change can be updated (AshPostgres.Test.TupleTest)
|
ash-ci (16) / mix test:
test/aggregate_test.exs#L932
test sum aggregates show the same value with filters on the sum vs filters on relationships (AshSql.AggregateTest)
|
ash-ci (16) / mix test:
test/rel_with_parent_filter_test.exs#L103
test can filter with stack parents (AshPostgres.RelWithParentFilterTest)
|
ash-ci (14) / mix test
Process completed with exit code 2.
|
ash-ci (14) / mix test:
test/aggregate_test.exs#L932
test sum aggregates show the same value with filters on the sum vs filters on relationships (AshSql.AggregateTest)
|
ash-ci (14) / mix test:
test/tuple_test.exs#L21
test tuple type with force_attribute_change can be updated (AshPostgres.Test.TupleTest)
|
ash-ci (14) / mix test:
test/rel_with_parent_filter_test.exs#L103
test can filter with stack parents (AshPostgres.RelWithParentFilterTest)
|
ash-ci (15) / mix sobelow
Range.new/2 and first..last default to a step of -1 when last < first. Use Range.new(first, last, -1) or first..last//-1, or pass 1 if that was your intention
|
ash-ci (16) / mix sobelow
Range.new/2 and first..last default to a step of -1 when last < first. Use Range.new(first, last, -1) or first..last//-1, or pass 1 if that was your intention
|
ash-ci (14) / mix sobelow
Range.new/2 and first..last default to a step of -1 when last < first. Use Range.new(first, last, -1) or first..last//-1, or pass 1 if that was your intention
|