Skip to content

chore: CATALYST-1272 prep for 1.0 release #2335

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: canary
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

matthewvolk
Copy link
Contributor

What/Why?

Warning

This PR should only be merged after we merge #2334

This PR builds on #2334 by adding the integrations/makeswift branch to the list of workflow triggers for the changesets-release.yml GitHub Action.

When merged, the code in this PR will immediately trigger a new run of the changesets-release.yml GitHub Action; this will update the existing Version Packages PR (#1892) title from Version Packages to Version Packages (canary). Since the workflow trigger has been expanded with the integrations/makeswift branch, the next time the integrations/makeswift branch is pushed to, it will create another PR called Versions Packages (integrations/makeswift).

Release Day

When we are ready to release @bigcommerce/catalyst-core@1.0.0 and @bigcommerce/catalyst-makeswift@1.0.0, we should follow the steps below:

  1. Ensure that a major version bump changeset exists for core/ (done), packages/client, packages/create-catalyst, and packages/eslint-config-catalyst
  2. Merge Version Packages (main)
  3. 🚀 This will release @bigcommerce/catalyst-core@1.0.0, @bigcommerce/create-catalyst@1.0.0, @bigcommerce/catalyst-client@1.0.0, and @bigcommerce/eslint-config-catalyst@1.0.0
  4. Merge branch canary into integrations/makeswift
    a. Ensure you do not overwrite the CHANGELOG.md with the CHANGELOG.md from canary
    b. Ensure you do not overwrite core/package.json fields for name or version on integrations/makeswift from canary
  5. After the merge commit, run pnpm changeset on integrations/makeswift to create a new major release for @bigcommerce/catalyst-makeswift. Link to the appropriate 1.0.0 entry in the canary changelog.
  6. Once merged, a PR called `Version Packages (integrations/makeswift) should be created
  7. Merge Version Packages (integrations/makeswift)
  8. 🚀 This will release @bigcommerce/catalyst-makeswift@1.0.0

Step 4 above should probably be automated, and we should also see if we can automate a PR to merge canary into integrations/makeswift whenever we merge a Version Packages (main) PR.

Testing

The changes and steps documented in this PR have been tested in the following playground repository:
https://github.com/matthewvolk/changesets-across-branches

Migration

N/A

@matthewvolk matthewvolk requested a review from a team as a code owner May 23, 2025 19:25
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 23, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 34c0eb6

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 23, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
catalyst-canary ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 5, 2025 9:57pm
3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
catalyst ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jun 5, 2025 9:57pm
catalyst-au ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 5, 2025 9:57pm
catalyst-uk ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 5, 2025 9:57pm

Copy link
Contributor

⚡️🏠 Lighthouse report

Lighthouse ran against https://catalyst-canary-ifonqiss8-bigcommerce-platform.vercel.app

🖥️ Desktop

We ran Lighthouse against the changes on a desktop and produced this report. Here's the summary:

Category Score
🟢 Performance 99
🟢 Accessibility 92
🟠 Best practices 78
🟢 SEO 91

📱 Mobile

We ran Lighthouse against the changes on a mobile and produced this report. Here's the summary:

Category Score
🟠 Performance 70
🟢 Accessibility 92
🟠 Best practices 78
🟢 SEO 92

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant