Skip to content

Conversation

nimdrak
Copy link
Contributor

@nimdrak nimdrak commented Sep 26, 2025

Fixed #27118

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

Signed-off-by: ByoungUk Lee <nimdrak@gmail.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none labels Sep 26, 2025
@nimdrak nimdrak marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2025 14:02
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nimdrak
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mtrmac for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 26, 2025
Signed-off-by: ByoungUk Lee <nimdrak@gmail.com>
Copy link

[NON-BLOCKING] Packit jobs failed. @containers/packit-build please check. Everyone else, feel free to ignore.

@nimdrak
Copy link
Contributor Author

nimdrak commented Sep 26, 2025

/assign

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Sep 26, 2025

@nimdrak nice catch ... we have really odd hardware sometimes for tests; i'm wondering if we should do a backoff instead of a straight 1 second wait? i.e. time := 500 * time.millisecond and then time := time + time with a loop iteration of like 5 or 6 ? wdyt ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test: fix "run healthcheck" bindings test
2 participants