Skip to content

Conversation

@joeworkman
Copy link

This fixes #37

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jul 25, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #38 into master will decrease coverage by 0.6%.
The diff coverage is 50%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #38      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage      98%   97.4%   -0.61%     
=========================================
  Files           3       3              
  Lines         201     154      -47     
=========================================
- Hits          197     150      -47     
  Misses          4       4

@deitch
Copy link
Owner

deitch commented Jul 27, 2018

Having though about it again in line with the comment here on the issue, I think this does make sense, but should be narrowed. A general "treat all strings as numbers if they pass !isNaN()" is asking for trouble. What if someone wants to look at "0001" as a string, and not a number? They used a string intentionally.

On the other hand, if we limit it to just if someone tells searchjs to treat it as a number - we don't care why, they can declare it - then we have limited the scope and returned expected behaviour to user control.

Let's do the following:

  1. Define a new modifier called _number which says, "treat this string field as number". Defaults to false, of course.
  2. If _number === true, then we treat the field as a number, as you wanted to
  3. Update the README to reflect it
  4. Add some tests to show it both not treating "6.5" as a number if _number is not set, and treating it as a number if _number is set.

If we do that, then this all works well.

Copy link
Owner

@deitch deitch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Define a new modifier called _number which says, "treat this string field as number". Defaults to false, of course. If _number === true, then we treat the field as a number.

  1. Create the logic for this to limit the scope
  2. Update the README to reflect it
  3. Add tests to show it both not treating "6.5" as a number if _number is not set, and treating it as a number if _number is set.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Type coercion for numerical comparison

3 participants