task/VSPC-209

[Girik1105]

Guidelines for Pull Requests

If you haven't yet read our code review guidelines, please do so, You can find them here.

Please confirm the following by adding an x for each item (turn [ ] into [x]).

• I have removed all code style changes that are not necessary (e.g. changing blanks across the whole file that don’t need to be changed, adding empty lines in parts other than your own code)
• I am not making any changes to files that don’t have any effect (e.g. imports added that don’t need to be added)
• I do not have any sysout statements in my code or commented out code that isn’t needed anymore
• I am not reformatting any files in the wrong format or without cause.
• I am not changing file encoding or line endings to something else than UTF-8, LF
• My pull request does not show an insane amount of files being changed although my ticket only requires a few files being changed
• I have added Javadoc/documentation where appropriate
• I have added test cases where appropriate
• I have explained any part of my code/implementation decisions that is not be self-explanatory

Please provide a brief description of your ticket

ContentBlockManager class needs to be separated into multiple manager classes

Description

The contentblockmanager class is getting too big. Let's separate the logic out into multiple manager classes, one for each type of content block.
There is a lot of duplicate code in there. Let’s extract a superclass with a shared delete and and get method, and an abstract getRepository method. The subclasses will then implement getRepository to return the repository for the class they manage, and create and update methods.
Additionally, contentOrder should not be a parameter for the create methods. I’m fairly certain the controllers just use the findMaxContentOrder method to get the last index and then pass that into the create methods (please check). Instead, the create methods should call the findMaxContentOrder .

VSPC-209

Anything else the reviewer needs to know?

... describe here ...

[diging-jenkins]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[diging-jenkins]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?