-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Create productContext.md #17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ | ||||||||||||||
| # productContext.md | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## What Is This Project? | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| `aligna` is a meta-framework for AI-native software collaboration. | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| It aims to reduce the need for repetitive prompting and manual instruction by embedding contextual knowledge directly within the project structure. | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| At the same time, it introduces the concept of **external reviewers**—humans or AI agents that provide oversight, validation, and feedback to ensure quality, guide decision-making, and constrain ungrounded behaviors. | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Why Does This Matter? | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| As AI systems become more capable, we face a fundamental challenge: | ||||||||||||||
| > How can we **control the quality** of autonomous AI activity within complex systems? | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| `aligna` addresses this by: | ||||||||||||||
| - Providing assistants with structured memory and navigation | ||||||||||||||
| - Delegating dynamic supervision to **reviewer agents** who can evaluate decisions, correct drift, and ensure adherence to purpose | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Who Is This For? | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| - Developers integrating AI into real software ecosystems | ||||||||||||||
| - Prompt engineers designing multi-agent workflows | ||||||||||||||
| - Reviewers (human or AI) assessing assistant outputs for accuracy, safety, or coherence | ||||||||||||||
| - Researchers exploring AI alignment through system-level design | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Design Principles | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| - **Static context guides active agents.** | ||||||||||||||
| - **Reviewers guide the agents.** | ||||||||||||||
| - **Bridge adapters connect agents to context.** | ||||||||||||||
| - **All logic is declarative and observable.** | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Key File Anchors | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| - `README.md`: Universal entrypoint | ||||||||||||||
| - `cline_docs/activeContext.md`: Current task state (bridge for Cline) | ||||||||||||||
| - `cline_docs/productContext.md`: Project identity and review philosophy | ||||||||||||||
|
Comment on lines
+36
to
+38
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. In the "Key File Anchors" section, listing the file paths is helpful. To further improve navigability and user experience, could we make these Markdown links? This would allow readers to directly jump to these important documents from here. (Please adjust paths if the assumed relative locations are incorrect.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Long-Term Goal | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| To enable reliable, explainable, tool-agnostic AI workflows grounded in: | ||||||||||||||
| - Declarative architecture | ||||||||||||||
| - Embedded context | ||||||||||||||
| - Independent review | ||||||||||||||
| - Promptless cooperation | ||||||||||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The long-term goal of "Promptless cooperation" is quite compelling and a key differentiator. To make its significance even clearer to the reader, would it be beneficial to add a short explanatory phrase? This could help articulate the vision behind this ambitious goal more vividly.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ## Reviewer Layer (Emerging) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| This project invites the integration of **reviewer agents**—entities that: | ||||||||||||||
| - Evaluate outputs | ||||||||||||||
| - Guide assistants back toward goals | ||||||||||||||
| - Record decisions and interventions for traceability | ||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| This layer will be prototyped via: | ||||||||||||||
| - Explicit reviewer prompts | ||||||||||||||
| - Human-in-the-loop validation | ||||||||||||||
| - Feedback-driven context updates | ||||||||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The design principle "Bridge adapters connect agents to context." is introduced here. While concise, it might leave readers wondering about the nature or function of these "bridge adapters," as they aren't elaborated upon elsewhere in this document.
Could we consider adding a brief parenthetical explanation to clarify their role? This would help readers better grasp this aspect of the system's architecture.