Enhance documentation for human-AI communication frameworks

[dmitriz]

User description

Update README and related documents to clarify human-AI collaboration principles and improve content migration summaries. Emphasize communication quality metrics and guidelines for effective interactions between humans and AI systems.

---

PR Type

Documentation, Enhancement

---

Description

• Refactored all documentation to focus on human-AI communication excellence

  • Updated guidelines, usage, and metrics to emphasize collaborative quality
  • Shifted from technical review to relationship and communication principles

• Added comprehensive content migration and future development planning docs

  • Summarized migration of technical and instructional content to other projects
  • Outlined strategic roadmap and cross-project integration for Aligna

• Updated README with migration details and new project boundaries

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Documentation

CONTENT_MIGRATION_COMPLETE.md Add migration completion summary and project boundary documentation CONTENT_MIGRATION_COMPLETE.md Added new file summarizing completed content migration tasks Documented project boundaries and cross-project integration Listed future plans and strategic outcomes for Aligna +50/-0    FUTURE_PLANS.md Add strategic roadmap and future plans for Aligna                FUTURE_PLANS.md Added new file outlining Aligna's future development roadmap Detailed immediate, short-term, medium-term, and long-term plans Included research partnerships, technology trends, and success metrics Listed resource requirements and risk mitigation strategies +195/-0  METRICS.md Refocus metrics on human-AI communication quality                METRICS.md Refocused metrics from technical review to communication quality Updated quantitative and qualitative indicators for collaboration Revised implementation approach for measuring relationship excellence Clarified purpose and tracking methods for communication metrics +40/-38  README.md Update README with migration and project focus details      README.md Added section on specialized content migration and project boundaries Updated references to migrated technical and instruction content Clarified Aligna's focus on communication excellence +5/-0      REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md Refactor guidelines for human-AI communication excellence REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md Refactored guidelines to focus on human-AI collaborative communication Replaced technical review principles with communication excellence principles Updated checklist and pitfalls to emphasize relationship quality Clarified philosophy around building understanding and trust +29/-27  USAGE_GUIDE.md Refactor usage guide for collaborative communication patterns USAGE_GUIDE.md Refocused usage guide on building excellent human-AI communication Replaced technical agent setup with collaborative communication frameworks Added trust-building, feedback, and adaptation patterns Provided practical examples for creative, business, and educational contexts +121/-130

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

This PR refocuses the Aligna documentation from AI agent–centric review guidance to human-AI communication excellence by overhauling the usage guide, metrics, and review guidelines, adding specialized migration references in the README, and introducing strategic roadmap and migration summary documents.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Overhaul usage guide to emphasize human-AI communication patterns	Replaced AI agent configuration steps with communication protocols and trust-building frameworks Defined human and AI roles, shared vocabulary, and feedback exchange patterns Replaced prompt templates with interactive trust-building and feedback examples	USAGE_GUIDE.md
Refocus metrics on communication quality	Replaced quantitative review KPIs with relationship indicators Redefined qualitative metrics for communication clarity, trust, and adaptability Updated implementation approach to capture collaboration feedback loops	METRICS.md
Revise review guidelines to center on collaborative communication	Renamed guidelines to human-AI communication principles Updated checklist to assess mutual understanding and respectful interaction Replaced common pitfalls and philosophy with communication-first guidance	REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md
Add cross-project migration references in project overview	Added specialized content migration entries linking to external projects Clarified where technical and instruction patterns now reside	README.md
Introduce strategic roadmap and migration summary documents	Created FUTURE_PLANS.md outlining immediate and long-term communication framework development Added CONTENT_MIGRATION_COMPLETE.md summarizing completed content moves and next steps	FUTURE_PLANS.md CONTENT_MIGRATION_COMPLETE.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[gemini-code-assist]

Warning

Gemini is unable to generate a summary due to a potential policy violation.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[qodo-merge-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

(Review updated until commit 7d25009)

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 Security concerns Sensitive information exposure: The PR contains hardcoded file paths in CONTENT_MIGRATION_COMPLETE.md (lines 7 and 11) that reveal username and potentially sensitive project structure information (C:\Users\dmitr\Projects...). This could expose personal information and internal project organization that shouldn't be publicly visible.

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Hardcoded Paths The file contains hardcoded file paths that appear to be user-specific (C:\Users\dmitr...). These should be replaced with relative paths or placeholders to ensure portability across different environments. - Created: `C:\Users\dmitr\Projects\guardrails-info\docs\ai_review_validation.md` - Includes: Technical validation principles, quality metrics, implementation frameworks - **Instruction Design Content**: Successfully migrated to AI-instructions project - Created: `C:\Users\dmitr\Projects\ai-instructions\cleaned\ai-review-patterns.md` - Includes: Dual-agent review patterns, domain adaptations, advanced instruction patterns Inconsistent Status Tracking The document mixes completed tasks with future tasks without clear separation in some sections, which could cause confusion about what has actually been completed versus what is planned. ### Week 1: Content Audit & Migration (STATUS: PARTIALLY COMPLETED) - [x] **Content Migration Executed**: Moved technical and instruction content to appropriate projects - ✅ Created AI Review Validation framework in Guardrails-info project - ✅ Created AI Review Patterns instruction framework in AI-instructions project - ✅ Updated Aligna files to focus on human-AI communication excellence - ✅ Added cross-project references and integration documentation - [ ] **FUTURE: Comprehensive Content Audit**: Complete systematic review of ALL content - Review every file in all three projects for additional overlaps - Validate all cross-references work correctly - Test integration workflows between projects - Create comprehensive migration documentation

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to 7d25009
Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Fix broken repository links The relative path links to external repositories won't work correctly in GitHub. Use absolute URLs or repository references instead of relative paths that attempt to navigate outside the current repository. README.md [81-84] ### Specialized Content Migration -- **Technical Review Patterns**: Moved to [AI Review Validation](../guardrails-info/docs/ai_review_validation.md) in Guardrails project -- **Instruction Design Patterns**: Moved to [AI Review Patterns](../ai-instructions/cleaned/ai-review-patterns.md) in AI-instructions project +- **Technical Review Patterns**: Moved to [AI Review Validation](https://github.com/organization/guardrails-info/blob/main/docs/ai_review_validation.md) in Guardrails project +- **Instruction Design Patterns**: Moved to [AI Review Patterns](https://github.com/organization/ai-instructions/blob/main/cleaned/ai-review-patterns.md) in AI-instructions project - **Communication Excellence**: Focused development in Aligna for human-AI collaboration Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that relative paths using ../ to navigate to external repositories won't work in GitHub, resulting in broken links. This is a functional issue that should be fixed.	Medium
Security	Remove personal file paths Replace absolute file paths with relative paths or repository references. Absolute paths containing personal user directories (C:\Users\dmitr</code>) expose personal information and won't work for other users accessing the documentation. CONTENT_MIGRATION_COMPLETE.md [6-12] - **Technical Review Content**: Successfully migrated to Guardrails-info project - - Created: `C:\Users\dmitr\Projects\guardrails-info\docs\ai_review_validation.md` + - Created: `docs/ai_review_validation.md` in Guardrails-info repository - Includes: Technical validation principles, quality metrics, implementation frameworks - **Instruction Design Content**: Successfully migrated to AI-instructions project - - Created: `C:\Users\dmitr\Projects\ai-instructions\cleaned\ai-review-patterns.md` + - Created: `cleaned/ai-review-patterns.md` in AI-instructions repository - Includes: Dual-agent review patterns, domain adaptations, advanced instruction patterns Apply / Chat Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that absolute paths with personal user directories (C:\Users\dmitr\) expose personal information and won't work for other users. This is a valid privacy and usability improvement.	Low
More

---

Previous suggestions

Suggestions up to commit 7d25009

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Security	Remove personal file paths The file paths contain absolute paths with personal username information (C:\Users\dmitr</code>), which could expose personal information and create portability issues. Replace these with relative paths or project-specific references to maintain privacy and ensure portability across different environments. CONTENT_MIGRATION_COMPLETE.md [6-12] - **Technical Review Content**: Successfully migrated to Guardrails-info project - - Created: `C:\Users\dmitr\Projects\guardrails-info\docs\ai_review_validation.md` + - Created: `guardrails-info/docs/ai_review_validation.md` - Includes: Technical validation principles, quality metrics, implementation frameworks - **Instruction Design Content**: Successfully migrated to AI-instructions project - - Created: `C:\Users\dmitr\Projects\ai-instructions\cleaned\ai-review-patterns.md` + - Created: `ai-instructions/cleaned/ai-review-patterns.md` - Includes: Dual-agent review patterns, domain adaptations, advanced instruction patterns Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: Valid privacy and portability concern. The absolute paths contain personal username information (dmitr) which should be removed from documentation. The improved code correctly converts to relative paths.	Medium
Possible issue	Fix broken documentation links The relative links to external projects may not work correctly if the repository structure changes or if users access the documentation from different contexts. Consider using absolute URLs or repository references that will remain stable regardless of where the documentation is viewed. README.md [81-84] ### Specialized Content Migration -- **Technical Review Patterns**: Moved to [AI Review Validation](../guardrails-info/docs/ai_review_validation.md) in Guardrails project -- **Instruction Design Patterns**: Moved to [AI Review Patterns](../ai-instructions/cleaned/ai-review-patterns.md) in AI-instructions project +- **Technical Review Patterns**: Moved to [AI Review Validation](https://github.com/organization/guardrails-info/blob/main/docs/ai_review_validation.md) in Guardrails project +- **Instruction Design Patterns**: Moved to [AI Review Patterns](https://github.com/organization/ai-instructions/blob/main/cleaned/ai-review-patterns.md) in AI-instructions project - **Communication Excellence**: Focused development in Aligna for human-AI collaboration Suggestion importance[1-10]: 2 __ Why: While the concern about relative links is valid, the proposed solution uses placeholder URLs (https://github.com/organization/...) that would be broken links, making the improvement worse than the original.	Low

[llamapreview]

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

Review Status: Automated Review Skipped

Dear contributor,

Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.

Analysis Result:

PR only contains documentation changes (6 files)

Technical Context:

Documentation changes typically include:

• Markdown/RST file updates
• API documentation
• Code comments
• README updates
• Documentation in /docs directory
• License and contribution files

We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.

Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team