Streamline README for Human-AI Communication Focus #21
Conversation
…uman-AI communication excellence
Reviewer's GuideThis PR streamlines the project’s documentation by fully removing the outdated README content, ensuring the repository is cleared of legacy descriptions and ready for a refreshed, focused guide on human-AI communication. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @dmitriz, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello team, gemini-code-assist here to provide a summary of this pull request. This PR, authored by dmitriz, aims to streamline the project's README to better emphasize its focus on human-AI communication excellence. Based on the title and description, the intent is to remove outdated content from the existing README to prepare for a clearer, more focused version. The changes in this specific PR involve the complete removal of the content from the README_NEW.md file.
Highlights
- README Streamlining: The primary goal of this PR is to streamline the project's README documentation.
- Content Removal: The existing content of the
README_NEW.mdfile has been entirely removed as part of the streamlining process. - Focus on Human-AI Communication: This change is intended to pave the way for a README that more clearly emphasizes the project's core focus on human-AI communication excellence.
Changelog
- README_NEW.md
- Removed the entire content of the file to streamline the README documentation.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
README gets a trim,
Old words fade into dim,
New focus takes hold.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
PR Code Suggestions ✨No code suggestions found for the PR. |
1 similar comment
PR Code Suggestions ✨No code suggestions found for the PR. |
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
Review Status: Automated Review Skipped
Dear contributor,
Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.
Analysis Result:
PR only contains documentation changes (1 files)
Technical Context:
Documentation changes typically include:
- Markdown/RST file updates
- API documentation
- Code comments
- README updates
- Documentation in /docs directory
- License and contribution files
We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.
Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request aims to streamline the project's documentation by deleting the README_NEW.md file. This is a positive step towards reducing redundancy and improving clarity, assuming README.md is the intended single source of truth for the project overview.
My review focuses on ensuring that no valuable information is inadvertently lost with this deletion. The content of README_NEW.md largely overlaps with the existing README.md and other project documents, which is good. I have one point of clarification regarding a specific resource link.
Summary of Findings
- Accessibility of Example Resources: The deleted
README_NEW.mdfile contained a 'Resources' section with a link to anexamples/directory. It's important to verify if this content is outdated, sufficiently covered by examples in other documents likeUSAGE_GUIDE.md, or if a link to these examples should be explicitly added to the mainREADME.mdto ensure continued easy access for users.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is generally in good shape and aligns with the goal of streamlining documentation. The deletion of README_NEW.md appears justified due to significant content overlap with README.md.
There is one medium-severity point of clarification regarding the examples/ resource linked in the deleted file. Addressing this point by confirming the status of these examples would be beneficial before merging.
I am unable to approve the pull request myself; please ensure it undergoes further review and approval as per your team's process. Assuming the examples are either outdated or adequately covered elsewhere, this change is a good improvement.
1 participant
Remove outdated content from the README to enhance clarity and emphasize the project's commitment to human-AI communication excellence.
Summary by Sourcery
Documentation: