Skip to content

Conversation

slobodanadamovic
Copy link
Contributor

@slobodanadamovic slobodanadamovic commented Sep 26, 2025

This PR introduces a dedicated _cross_project_search user to perform internal orchestration actions for cross project operations, like establishing remote cluster handshakes, cancelling cross cluster searches, etc...

@slobodanadamovic slobodanadamovic self-assigned this Sep 26, 2025
@slobodanadamovic slobodanadamovic added >non-issue :Security/Authorization Roles, Privileges, DLS/FLS, RBAC/ABAC Team:Security Meta label for security team labels Sep 26, 2025
@slobodanadamovic slobodanadamovic marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2025 12:33
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-security (Team:Security)

Copy link
Contributor

@n1v0lg n1v0lg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM -- it's nice to see how much easier it is to add a new internal user than it used to be. One question: do we need a new transport version for this change?

@slobodanadamovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

One question: do we need a new transport version for this change?

Good question. I thought about this and it's not needed. Reason is because the internal user is unused and thus never gets sent over transport protocol. My plan is to introduce a new transport version and checks when I start using it.

@slobodanadamovic slobodanadamovic changed the title Add new internal cross-project access user Add new internal cross-project search user Sep 29, 2025
@slobodanadamovic slobodanadamovic merged commit 68ec7b1 into elastic:main Sep 29, 2025
40 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

>non-issue :Security/Authorization Roles, Privileges, DLS/FLS, RBAC/ABAC Team:Security Meta label for security team v9.2.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants