[go_router_builder]: Add support for relative routes #9749
Merged
+961
−78
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
11 tasks
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces support for relative routes with TypedRelativeGoRoute. I've added one suggestion to improve validation by ensuring that paths for relative routes are not absolute, which will help catch errors early during development.
This was referenced Aug 5, 2025
LukasMirbt
force-pushed
the
go-router-builder/add-support-for-relative-routes
branch
9 times, most recently
from
2162d41 to
2f641f3
Compare
|
Update
|
LukasMirbt
force-pushed
the
go-router-builder/add-support-for-relative-routes
branch
3 times, most recently
from
a2592d6 to
31d0358
Compare
chunhtai
reviewed
Aug 7, 2025
LukasMirbt
force-pushed
the
go-router-builder/add-support-for-relative-routes
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0cd3be6 to
db007f4
Compare
|
Update
|
LukasMirbt
force-pushed
the
go-router-builder/add-support-for-relative-routes
branch
6 times, most recently
from
eea9408 to
a9a7c30
Compare
LukasMirbt
force-pushed
the
go-router-builder/add-support-for-relative-routes
branch
10 times, most recently
from
949e44a to
872280b
Compare
auto-submit bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2025
) Adds `RelativeGoRouteData` and `TypedRelativeGoRoute` to support type-safe relative routes. Foundation for #9749 which adds relative route support in `go_router_builder`. Continuation of #8476 by @ThangVuNguyenViet Compared to #8476, the approach taken in this PR avoids breaking changes and creates a separate `RouteData` subclass instead of extending `GoRouteData`. The approach increases flexibility and avoids extending behavior that might not make sense for a relative route. Necessary to fully resolve flutter/flutter#108177. ## Pre-Review Checklist **Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code Assist for GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code). Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed. [^1]: Regular contributors who have demonstrated familiarity with the repository guidelines only need to comment if the PR is not auto-exempted by repo tooling.
|
the base pr is merged, can you rebase and see if the ci passes? |
LukasMirbt
force-pushed
the
go-router-builder/add-support-for-relative-routes
branch
from
872280b to
1ad8184
Compare
|
|
LukasMirbt
force-pushed
the
go-router-builder/add-support-for-relative-routes
branch
3 times, most recently
from
21a980d to
0afd194
Compare
|
@chunhtai CI passing! |
LukasMirbt
force-pushed
the
go-router-builder/add-support-for-relative-routes
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b6f6e91 to
f04874b
Compare
LukasMirbt
force-pushed
the
go-router-builder/add-support-for-relative-routes
branch
from
f04874b to
7a6ba60
Compare
chunhtai
added
the
autosubmit
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds support for TypedRelativeGoRoute.
Builds on #9732
Continuation of #8476 by @ThangVuNguyenViet
Compared to #8476, the approach taken in this PR avoids breaking changes and creates a separate RouteData subclass instead of extending GoRouteData. The approach increases flexibility and avoids extending behavior that might not make sense for a relative route.
Fully resolves flutter/flutter#108177.
Pre-Review Checklist
[shared_preferences]pubspec.yamlwith an appropriate new version according to the pub versioning philosophy, or I have commented below to indicate which version change exemption this PR falls under1.CHANGELOG.mdto add a description of the change, following repository CHANGELOG style, or I have commented below to indicate which CHANGELOG exemption this PR falls under1.///).If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.
Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of Gemini Code Assist for GitHub. Comments from the
gemini-code-assistbot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed.Footnotes
Regular contributors who have demonstrated familiarity with the repository guidelines only need to comment if the PR is not auto-exempted by repo tooling. ↩ ↩2 ↩3