Skip to content

Conversation

clarus
Copy link
Collaborator

@clarus clarus commented May 4, 2024

This branch represent some work and I am not sure it is that useful. This idea is to add a type A.t:

Module A.
  Inductive t : Set :=
  | Make {A : Set} (x : A) (to_value : A -> Value.t).
End A.

that forces to keep the values abstract. But it also complexifies the semantics rules.

@clarus clarus changed the title Draft: Add revm code Draft: Represent values only with their abstract version May 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant