Update to pyodide 0.28.1, micropip 0.10 #202
Conversation
|
|
bollwyvl
changed the title
| @@ -560,7 +559,7 @@ ${e.stack}`; | |||
| reject: () => void; | |||
| resolve: () => void; | |||
| } | null = null; | |||
| protected _pyodide: Pyodide.PyodideInterface = null as any; | |||
| protected _pyodide: Pyodide.PyodideAPI = null as any; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Noting that PyodideInterface can be brought back when upgrading to 0.28.2: pyodide/pyodide#5827
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not sure if we should go ahead with this PR since the latest pyodide 0.28.1 dropped a couple of packages due to build issues.
So maybe we should not backport that as a 0.6.x change because this is likely going to break some deployments.
@agriyakhetarpal what do you think about opening a new PR against main to update to the 0.28.2 version? Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You're right; we've been working to build back the most commonly requested packages in pyodide/pyodide-recipes#99. It will take a bit of time until this is ironed out, because it is something we have to take up with the maintainers of those disabled packages and we cannot bring them back alone.
A new PR to update to Pyodide 0.28.2 makes sense to me, I'll create one!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yep, "don't break user space," is a good reason to belay this, will close out.
references
@jupyterlite/kernelassets are needed innode_modules(not justsharedPackages) to be built into the workersmicropipstuff, but this is not sustainablechanges
pyodide 0.28.1in the usual placespyodide.PyodideInterfacetopyodide.PyodideAPIpipliteformicropip 0.10.1--reinstalland--constraintsbackwards incompatible changes
python 3.13andemscripten 40.7.xline, even if0.6,x(which would stay onpyodide 0.27) continues to get updates for the nextjupyterlite-corealternatives