Skip to content

Correct LiDAR (3DBox) -> Camera (3DBox) calculation #79

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Petros626
Copy link

I used the two original methods lidar_to_camera and lidar_to_camera_box to calculate a label in camera frame. I realised that the y-value never matched the original label, even though I was using the appropriate calibration file instead of the mean values in cnf..

Original camera label (h, w, l, x, y, z):  [1.48, 1.64, 3.59, -7.09, 1.75, 10.15, 1.57]
My approach output (x, y, z, h, w, l):     [-7.09, 1.75, 10.15, 1.48, 1.64, 3.59, 1.57]
Complex-YOLO output (x, y, z, h, w, l):    [-7.09, 1.01, 10.16, 1.48, 1.64, 3.59, 1.57]

Complex-YOLO uses the wrong matrix multiplication (order, no tranpose) and no height adjustment (reference point from box center to bottom)

Doesn't adjust for box center height.
Uses different matrix multiplication order.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant