Skip to content

Conversation

@antono
Copy link

@antono antono commented Oct 30, 2025

Belarus:

  • Allowed: 433.075 MHz - 434.775 MHz (power: 10 milliwatts)
  • Disallowed: 868 MHz

Source: www.mpt.gov.by

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 30, 2025 07:51
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 30, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for the Belarus (BY) region to the Meshtastic channel options, defining the allowed frequency range of 433.075 MHz - 434.775 MHz with 10 milliwatt power restrictions, as per Belarus radio frequency regulations.

  • Adds new BY enum entry to RegionInfo with Belarus-specific frequency configuration
  • Includes regulatory documentation reference for Belarus radio frequency usage
  • Adds minor formatting cleanup (blank line at end of companion object)

antono and others added 2 commits October 30, 2025 10:52
…tion.kt

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vasiljev <antono.vasiljev@gmail.com>
@DaneEvans DaneEvans added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 30, 2025
@DaneEvans DaneEvans added this to the 2.7.6 milestone Oct 30, 2025
@jamesarich
Copy link
Collaborator

jamesarich commented Oct 30, 2025

@antono - is this already supported in the protobufs? If not it needs to be prior for this to be functional.

@jamesarich jamesarich removed this from the 2.7.6 milestone Oct 30, 2025
@antono
Copy link
Author

antono commented Oct 30, 2025

@antono - is this already supported in the protobufs? If not it needs to be prior for this to be functional.

Thanks for mentioning. Just added pull request meshtastic/protobufs#800

@jamesarich
Copy link
Collaborator

@antono - is this already supported in the protobufs? If not it needs to be prior for this to be functional.

Thanks for mentioning. Just added pull request meshtastic/protobufs#800

you may want to open issues/MRs in the other clients as well (iOS, web, python) for full support

@antono
Copy link
Author

antono commented Oct 31, 2025

@jamesarich it looks like all other clients pick up values directly from protobufs. So meshtastic/protobufs#800 is only dependency now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request Upstream

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants