Integrate SEGGER RTT implementation #1278
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
salkinium
force-pushed
the
feature/rtt
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6c7cdfa to
f45ed37
Compare
salkinium
force-pushed
the
feature/rtt
branch
2 times, most recently
from
0c2a3ad to
62a5aec
Compare
salkinium
force-pushed
the
feature/rtt
branch
3 times, most recently
from
02ea9d9 to
27a3ddf
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
modm:rttmodule with modm port.modm:platform:rttto use the SEGGER RTT code.Figure out a way to place all buffers into uncached memory (using the MPU).doing this laterFix telnetlib3 API changeSwitched to using netcat, much better.Closes #1277 by definition.
cc @WasabiFan @chris-durand