Internal server error if there are multiple matching callbacks #272
Conversation
…ication method/credentials. Error for multiple callbacks restricted to route-methods with the same authentication (method + credentials).
…ication method/credentials. Error for multiple callbacks restricted to route-methods with the same authentication (method + credentials).
WalkthroughThe changes in the pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant WebServer
participant API
Client->>WebServer: Send request for SimpleRouteController_MultipleCallback
WebServer->>API: Forward request
API-->>WebServer: Return 500 status code and response body
WebServer-->>Client: Return response
Client->>WebServer: Send request for MixedController_ApiKeyPublic_ApiKey
WebServer->>API: Forward request with API key
API-->>WebServer: Return response
WebServer-->>Client: Return response
Client->>WebServer: Send request for MixedController_ApiKeyPublic_Public
WebServer->>API: Forward request
API-->>WebServer: Return response
WebServer-->>Client: Return response
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/WebServerE2ETests/nanoFramework WebServer E2E Tests.postman_collection.json (2)
217-247: LGTM! Good addition for error handling.The new test case "SimpleRouteController_MultipleCallback" is a valuable addition to check the server's behavior when multiple matching callbacks are found. It correctly tests for a 500 status code and verifies the error message.
Consider adding a comment in the test script to explain the purpose of this test case, which might help other developers understand its importance quickly.
"exec": [ + "// Test the server's response when multiple matching callbacks are found", "pm.test(\"Status 500 and message\", function () {\r", " pm.response.to.have.status(500);\r", " pm.response.to.have.body(\"Multiple matching callbacks: WebServerE2ETests.SimpleRouteController.FirstOfMultipleCallback, WebServerE2ETests.SimpleRouteController.SecondOfMultipleCallback.\");\r", "});" ],
986-1399: Excellent addition of comprehensive authentication test cases!The new test cases for MixedController with various authentication combinations (Basic, ApiKey, and Public) significantly enhance the test coverage. They effectively test:
- Different authentication methods individually
- Combinations of authentication methods
- Multiple user scenarios (e.g., different API keys and Basic auth credentials)
- Error cases for multiple matching callbacks
These tests will greatly help in ensuring the robustness and correctness of the authentication system.
Consider grouping these related test cases into a folder within the Postman collection. This would improve organization and make it easier to run all mixed authentication tests together. You can do this by adding a new "item" object that contains these test cases. For example:
{ "name": "Mixed Authentication Tests", "item": [ // Place all the MixedController test cases here ] }This structure will make the collection more maintainable as it grows.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (9)
.editorconfigis excluded by none and included by noneREADME.mdis excluded by!**/*.mdand included by nonenanoFramework.WebServer/WebServer.csis excluded by none and included by nonespelling_exclusion.dicis excluded by none and included by nonetests/WebServerE2ETests/AuthController.csis excluded by none and included by nonetests/WebServerE2ETests/MixedController.csis excluded by none and included by nonetests/WebServerE2ETests/Program.csis excluded by none and included by nonetests/WebServerE2ETests/SimpleRouteController.csis excluded by none and included by nonetests/WebServerE2ETests/WebServerE2ETests.nfprojis excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/WebServerE2ETests/nanoFramework WebServer E2E Tests.postman_collection.json (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/WebServerE2ETests/nanoFramework WebServer E2E Tests.postman_collection.json (3)
909-984: LGTM! Comprehensive testing for mixed authentication scenarios.The addition of test cases "MixedController_ApiKeyPublic_ApiKey" and "MixedController_ApiKeyPublic_Public" is excellent. These tests ensure that the endpoint behaves correctly for both ApiKey authentication and public access.
These test cases improve the coverage of authentication scenarios and help ensure the robustness of the authentication system.
1433-1436: LGTM! New variables enhance test flexibility.The addition of
auth_basic_username2andauth_apikey2variables is a good practice. These variables:
- Support testing multiple user scenarios
- Make the tests more flexible and easier to maintain
- Allow for easy updates of credentials without changing the test scripts
This approach aligns well with best practices in test design and improves the overall quality of the test suite.
Also applies to: 1448-1450
Line range hint
1-1453: Overall, excellent enhancements to the test suite!The changes in this pull request significantly improve the test coverage for authentication scenarios in the nanoFramework WebServer. Key improvements include:
- New test cases for handling multiple callbacks
- Comprehensive tests for mixed authentication scenarios (ApiKey, Basic, and Public)
- Additional variables to support multiple user testing
These enhancements will help ensure the robustness and correctness of the authentication system. The new tests are well-structured and consistent with the existing test suite.
Great job on expanding the test coverage without disrupting the existing tests. This will contribute to the overall quality and reliability of the nanoFramework WebServer.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me. Thanks a lot. @josesimoes I let you merge it if you're happy as well.
|
@frobijn thank you again for your contribution! 🙏😄 .NET nanoFramework is all about community involvement, and no contribution is too small. Please edit it and add an entry with your GitHub username in the appropriate location (names are sorted alphabetically): (Feel free to adjust your name if it's not correct) |
Description
This is a continuation of #269, after that branch mistakenly got deleted. The new branch is based on the main branch after #270 and #271.
Motivation and Context
See #269
Types of changes
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
SimpleRouteController_MultipleCallback,MixedController_ApiKeyPublic_ApiKey, andMixedController_ApiKeyPublic_Public.