Skip to content

Conversation

nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Feb 25, 2025

Bumps nanoFramework.System.Net.Http.Server from 1.5.179 to 1.5.180

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Upgraded the HTTP server component to version 1.5.180 across the application and testing environments to maintain improved stability and reliability.

Bumps nanoFramework.System.Net.Http.Server from 1.5.179 to 1.5.180</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the dependency information for the package nanoFramework.System.Net.Http.Server across multiple packages.lock.json files. The version is bumped from 1.5.179 to 1.5.180 and the corresponding contentHash values are updated accordingly. These changes have been applied in both the main projects and the test projects to ensure consistency.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.lock.json, nanoFramework.WebServer/packages.lock.json,
tests/WebServerE2ETests/packages.lock.json, tests/nanoFramework.WebServer.Tests/packages.lock.json
Updated dependency nanoFramework.System.Net.Http.Server from version 1.5.179 to 1.5.180; updated associated contentHash values.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d34bf0d and 1d11680.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (10)
  • nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.WebServer.nuspec is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.WebServer/nanoFramework.WebServer.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • nanoFramework.WebServer/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • tests/WebServerE2ETests/WebServerE2ETests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • tests/WebServerE2ETests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • tests/nanoFramework.WebServer.Tests/nanoFramework.WebServer.Tests.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • tests/nanoFramework.WebServer.Tests/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • nanoFramework.WebServer/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • tests/WebServerE2ETests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • tests/nanoFramework.WebServer.Tests/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
nanoFramework.WebServer.FileSystem/packages.lock.json (1)

41-46: Updated Dependency for nanoFramework.System.Net.Http.Server Correctly Applied

The dependency update reflects the version bump from 1.5.179 to 1.5.180. The updated "requested", "resolved", and "contentHash" fields are all consistent with this change, ensuring that the file now points to the correct package version.

nanoFramework.WebServer/packages.lock.json (1)

35-40: Consistent Package Version Bump

The package "nanoFramework.System.Net.Http.Server" in this file has been updated to version 1.5.180. The changes in "requested", "resolved", and "contentHash" match those applied elsewhere in the repository, ensuring consistency across project dependencies.

tests/WebServerE2ETests/packages.lock.json (1)

47-52: Upgrade Applied to System.Net.Http.Server Dependency

The dependency for "nanoFramework.System.Net.Http.Server" has been correctly bumped to version 1.5.180 with the appropriate changes to the "requested", "resolved", and "contentHash" values. This consistent update across test components helps maintain alignment with the main projects.

tests/nanoFramework.WebServer.Tests/packages.lock.json (1)

41-46: Aligned Dependency Version Update

The dependency update in this test file mirrors the changes made in the other parts of the project. The "nanoFramework.System.Net.Http.Server" package now points to version 1.5.180, complete with updated "requested", "resolved", and "contentHash" fields, ensuring comprehensive consistency across the codebase.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@nfbot nfbot merged commit ff730fe into main Feb 25, 2025
6 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/020e6639-c8cd-425c-89ca-c015b26a2326 branch February 25, 2025 19:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant