-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8364519: Sort share/classfile includes #26590
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back fandreuz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@fandreuz This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@shipilev, @albertnetymk) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine, with a nit.
/reviewers 2
#include "oops/oop.hpp" | ||
#include "oops/oop.inline.hpp" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Take this opportunity to remove the include of oop.hpp
, since we are including oop.inline.hpp
anyway?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, I got a few here: 3477cbc
Could this be a possible improvement of SortIncludes.java
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe, but it is not exactly the include order issue. We do these clean ups opportunistically, when it is glaringly obvious it is an unnecessary include.
#include "oops/oop.hpp" | ||
#include "oops/oop.inline.hpp" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe, but it is not exactly the include order issue. We do these clean ups opportunistically, when it is glaringly obvious it is an unnecessary include.
/integrate |
The test failure does not seem to be related to the changes in this PR |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 3387b31.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
This PR sorts the includes in hotspot/share/classfile using SortIncludes.java. I'm also adding the directory to TestIncludesAreSorted.
Passes tier1.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26590/head:pull/26590
$ git checkout pull/26590
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26590
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26590/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26590
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26590
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26590.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment