Skip to content

8364531: G1: Factor out liveness tracing code #26591

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl commented Aug 1, 2025

Hi all,

please review this refactoring, eliminating some copy&paste, in cset candidate group liveness logging.

The output is mostly the same, except for the young cset group, where the "-" has been replaced to just print the default value (0.0) for efficiency. I did not see this important to have, the gc efficiency for young gen isn't interesting.

Testing: local compilation, gha, visual inspection of output

Thanks,
Thomas


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8364531: G1: Factor out liveness tracing code (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26591/head:pull/26591
$ git checkout pull/26591

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26591
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26591/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26591

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26591

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26591.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Hi all,

  please review this refactoring, eliminating some copy&paste, in cset candidate group liveness logging.

The output is mostly the same, except for the young cset group, where the "-" has been replaced to just print the default value (0.0) for efficiency. I did not see this important to have, the gc efficiency for young gen isn't interesting.

Testing: local compilation, gha, visual inspection of output

Thanks,
  Thomas
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 1, 2025

👋 Welcome back tschatzl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 1, 2025

@tschatzl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8364531: G1: Factor out liveness tracing code

Reviewed-by: ayang, sangheki

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 44 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8364531 8364531: G1: Factor out liveness tracing code Aug 1, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 1, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 1, 2025

@tschatzl The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 1, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 4, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 4, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 4, 2025
Copy link
Member

@sangheon sangheon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good as is.

This might be a preference thing.
log_xxx_group() doesn't update _total_remset_bytes while log_xxx_grouplist() updates it. It might be better to update it from log_xxx_group() with or without proper name change? e.g. append_total_and_log_cset_candidate()

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 5, 2025
@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

tschatzl commented Aug 5, 2025

Looks good as is.

This might be a preference thing. log_xxx_group() doesn't update _total_remset_bytes while log_xxx_grouplist() updates it. It might be better to update it from log_xxx_group() with or without proper name change? e.g. append_total_and_log_cset_candidate()

I originally considered that then did not do, fixed.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 5, 2025
@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

tschatzl commented Aug 5, 2025

Thanks @albertnetymk @sangheon for your reviews

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Going to push as commit d906e45.
Since your change was applied there have been 45 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 5, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 5, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 5, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 5, 2025

@tschatzl Pushed as commit d906e45.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants