-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 660
OCPBUGS-61569: Fix bug with Console provided PatternFly shared modules #15479
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-61569: Fix bug with Console provided PatternFly shared modules #15479
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: spadgett, vojtechszocs The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
@vojtechszocs: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61569, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@vojtechszocs: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61569, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@vojtechszocs: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61569, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@jhadvig: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61569, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/retest |
@vojtechszocs: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61569, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
verified the changes with following steps
Visit topology page Screen.Recording.2025-09-18.at.2.52.24.PM.mov |
@yapei could somebody from your team verify this issue 🙏 |
/verified by @yapei |
@yapei: This PR has been marked as verified by In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@vojtechszocs: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
350061f
into
openshift:release-4.18
@vojtechszocs: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61569 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61569 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Fix included in accepted release 4.18.0-0.nightly-2025-09-19-205454 |
Bug fix for 4.18 Console plugin SDK related to recent addition of
@patternfly/react-topology
shared module in #15371.This affects the package
@openshift-console/dynamic-plugin-sdk-webpack
containing code for processing shared module configuration.The original assumption was
The updated assumption is now