Skip to content

Prioritise static BGP filters over user defined ones #10457

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mazdakn
Copy link
Member

@mazdakn mazdakn commented May 23, 2025

Description

Related issues/PRs

Todos

  • Tests
  • Documentation
  • Release note

Release Note

TBD

Reminder for the reviewer

Make sure that this PR has the correct labels and milestone set.

Every PR needs one docs-* label.

  • docs-pr-required: This change requires a change to the documentation that has not been completed yet.
  • docs-completed: This change has all necessary documentation completed.
  • docs-not-required: This change has no user-facing impact and requires no docs.

Every PR needs one release-note-* label.

  • release-note-required: This PR has user-facing changes. Most PRs should have this label.
  • release-note-not-required: This PR has no user-facing changes.

Other optional labels:

  • cherry-pick-candidate: This PR should be cherry-picked to an earlier release. For bug fixes only.
  • needs-operator-pr: This PR is related to install and requires a corresponding change to the operator.

@mazdakn mazdakn requested a review from a team as a code owner May 23, 2025 01:13
@mazdakn mazdakn added release-note-required Change has user-facing impact (no matter how small) docs-not-required Docs not required for this change labels May 23, 2025
@marvin-tigera marvin-tigera added this to the Calico v3.31.0 milestone May 23, 2025
@caseydavenport
Copy link
Member

@mazdakn could you add some details to the description explaining why we want to do this?

This feels like potentially a major breaking change for folks running with BGPFilters - do you have any idea how users would upgrade here?

@mazdakn
Copy link
Member Author

mazdakn commented May 29, 2025

@caseydavenport Absolutely. I'll add more context here.
Yes, the change potentially a breaking one. That's why I like more input on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs-not-required Docs not required for this change release-note-required Change has user-facing impact (no matter how small)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants