Skip to content

Conversation

ddarby-hike
Copy link
Contributor

Enable Custom Slack template message

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 15, 2025 17:07
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

A concise description of the purpose of the PR, followed by summarized bullets of changes

  • Adds support for specifying a custom Freemarker template in the Slack notification docs
  • Documents where to install the custom template and default behavior when left blank
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

docs/manual/notifications/slack.md:25

  • Indent the new bullet to match the existing list (e.g., add a leading space before the hyphen) so it aligns with other items.
- **Custom Template**

docs/manual/notifications/slack.md:26

  • Add a leading space before the colon to align the description under the bullet (e.g., :).
: Filename of a custom Freemarker template to use for the notification.  The template should be installed in "/var/lib/rundeck/libext/templates/\<filename\>".  Leave blank to use the default template.

@fdevans fdevans self-requested a review July 15, 2025 17:41
@fdevans fdevans added this to the 5.14.0 milestone Jul 15, 2025
@fdevans
Copy link
Contributor

fdevans commented Jul 15, 2025

I believe this goes in conjunction with a feature PR on this repo:
rundeck-plugins/slack-incoming-webhook-plugin#43

Once the enhancement is reviewed and merged we can merge this.

@fdevans fdevans changed the title Enable Custom Slack template message Enable Custom Slack template Docs Jul 15, 2025
@fdevans fdevans modified the milestones: 5.14.0, 5.15.0 Aug 7, 2025
@fdevans fdevans changed the title Enable Custom Slack template Docs RUN-3598: Enable Custom Slack template Docs Aug 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants