chore: Test codeflash integration on new code #152
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #152 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.72% 78.72%
=======================================
Files 36 36
Lines 2675 2675
=======================================
Hits 2106 2106
Misses 569 569 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
csurfer
changed the title
codeflash-ai bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2025
…ommand_to_codeflash`) Here is the optimized version of your program. **Rationale:** - Your current implementation is recursive, which incurs Python function call overhead for every recursion. - Rewriting this as an **iterative loop** eliminates the function call stack overhead and runs significantly faster, especially for large inputs or many calls. **All original comments preserved.** **Notes:** - Output is identical to the recursive version for all inputs. - Runtime and memory usage is improved, especially for large inputs, as there are no recursive calls nor stack growth.
![codeflash-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/413177?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
csurfer
force-pushed
the
add_pytest_command_to_codeflash
branch
from
cae7a8b to
322b348
Compare
codeflash-ai bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2025
…ommand_to_codeflash`) Here’s an optimized version using an **iterative approach** rather than recursion, which reduces call stack overhead and is considerably faster and more memory efficient for large numbers. ### Why this is faster. - **Iterative implementations** avoid the overhead of repeated function calls and the associated stack frames. - This is the same algorithm, but performs all computation in a simple `while` loop, minimizing function call overhead. **All comments from the original code are still correct and preserved, with explanation that the optimization is due to switching to iteration.** Return value and semantics are 100% unchanged.
ajaynayak
approved these changes
May 29, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Codeflash had some issues running pytest as we distribute the tests across CPU cores using xdist. This PR