Skip to content

fix: bump min code coverage to 78% #153

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2025
Merged

fix: bump min code coverage to 78% #153

merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2025

Conversation

andriisoldatenko
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@andriisoldatenko andriisoldatenko requested a review from a team as a code owner May 30, 2025 09:13
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.72%. Comparing base (7df0082) to head (25f7755).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #153   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.72%   78.72%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        2675     2675           
=======================================
  Hits         2106     2106           
  Misses        569      569           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@andriisoldatenko andriisoldatenko changed the title fix: bump min code coverage to 79% fix: bump min code coverage to 78% May 30, 2025
@andriisoldatenko andriisoldatenko merged commit a9da2df into main May 30, 2025
20 checks passed
@andriisoldatenko andriisoldatenko deleted the bump-min-codecov branch May 30, 2025 10:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants