-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 249
feat(efc): s3 #5448
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
feat(efc): s3 #5448
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
75 changes: 75 additions & 0 deletions
75
pages/environmental-footprint/additional-content/object-storage-env-footprint.mdx
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ | ||
--- | ||
title: Object Storage footprint calculation | ||
description: This page explains how Scaleway calculates the environmental footprint of Object Storage in detail. | ||
tags: object storage environmental-footprint impact cloud-computing | ||
dates: | ||
validation: 2025-08-22 | ||
posted: 2025-08-22 | ||
--- | ||
|
||
|
||
This page includes the specificities of the environmental footprint calculation for Object Storage. | ||
|
||
## Calculation aspects | ||
|
||
The total estimated impact of Object Storage volumes is calculated by integrating the: | ||
|
||
- **Dedicated manufacturing impact** - Related to the physical servers hosting the storage volumes. | ||
- **Related manufacturing impact** - The impact of the tools used to manage the Object Storage offers: control plane, monitoring, internal load balancers, and others. | ||
- **Energy usage impact** - The average electricity consumption of storage servers and their energy efficiency and of the tools used to manage the Object Storage offers. | ||
|
||
### Ratio per storage volume | ||
|
||
To allocate the impact of an Object Storage volume, we apply the unit resulting from the RCP allocation rule, the s3_ratio, to all calculation steps: | ||
|
||
``` | ||
s3_ratio = VOLsto/VolstoPool | ||
``` | ||
|
||
- **VOLsto** - represents the **reserved volume** per user. In Object Storage, your data is replicated 1.5 times on multiple nodes to guarantee availability, so the **VOLsto** is applied with factor of 1.5 to account for replication. | ||
- **VolstoPool** - represents the total storage volume reserved for Object Storage. For this product, only 80% of the total storage capacity of the machines is available. The remaining 20% is reserved for performance reasons. | ||
|
||
In the example below we consider a **VOLsto** of 150 GB and a **VolstoPool** of 800 GB. | ||
|
||
``` | ||
s3_ratio = 150/800 = 0.19 | ||
``` | ||
|
||
### Manufacturing impact | ||
|
||
The calculation of the manufacturing impact of Object Storage volumes is based on: | ||
|
||
- The manufacturing impact of servers that host user storage | ||
- The manufacturing impact of servers used by the Scaleway Object Storage team to manage the service - on both the Control and Data planes | ||
ldecarvalho-doc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- The manufacturing and electricity consumption impact of the remaining product lifecycle aspects: datacenters and technical environment, network and cross-IT equipment & stocks. | ||
|
||
The calculation is the same one used for [measuring the impact of manufacturing for Bare Metal servers](/environmental-footprint/additional-content/environmental-footprint-calculator), which we consider the basis footprint calculation, but for Object Storage we also apply the `s3_ratio` to break the impact down to only the allocated volumes. | ||
|
||
#### Calculation example | ||
|
||
For the example below, we consider a single server with a lifespan of 6 years (52 560 hours) and power of 110w. We measure the impact of 100 hours and consider through [Boavizta estimates](https://www.boavizta.org/) that the impact of the manufacturing of this server is 850 kgCo2e. Also considering a `s3_ratio` of `0.19`, we make the following calculation: | ||
|
||
``` | ||
VolumeManufacturingImpact = (100 / 52560) * 850 * 0.19 = 0.3 kgCO2e | ||
``` | ||
|
||
In the example, the dedicated manufacturing impact of a 150 GB usage for 100 hours is 0.3 kgCo2e. | ||
|
||
### Usage impact | ||
|
||
The calculation of the usage impact of Object Storage volumes is based on: | ||
|
||
- Impact of electricity consumption of servers that host user storage | ||
- Impact of electricity consumption of infrastructure and service management servers by the Scaleway Object Storage team to run the Object Storage service. In this case we consider both the Control and Data planes. | ||
ldecarvalho-doc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
- The electricity consumption impact of the remaining product lifecycle aspects: datacenters and technical environment, network and cross-IT equipment & stocks. | ||
|
||
Since Object Storage is a regional product, we consider the energy mix of the country and the average PUE of data centers in the region to calculate the impact of a kwh. | ||
|
||
In the example below, the energy mix is O,065kgCo2e/kwh and the PUE is 1.16. Considering a server electrical consumption of 600wh, 100 hours of usage, and a `s3_ratio` of `0.19`, the total usage impact comes down to: | ||
|
||
```math | ||
UsageImpact = 0.600 * 100 * 1.16 * 0.065v* 0.19 = 0.74 kgCo2e | ||
``` | ||
|
||
In the example, the usage impact of a 100 GB usage for 100 hours is 0.74 kgCo2e. | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.